← Feed Deep Dive Matrix Subscribe

Side-Channel Risks Across Advanced Chiplet Packages (UGA, CNRS) - Semiconductor Engineering

semiengineering.com 2026-05-26 Semiconductor Engineering
Entities
Tags
Chiplet IntegrationAdvanced PackagingSide-Channel AttacksSemiconductor Security2.5D Integration3D IntegrationChip Design SecurityCybersecurityHardware SecurityInter-Chip CommunicationPhysical Attack SurfaceMalware Analysis
News Summary
Researchers from Grenoble INP – UGA and CNRS’s TIMA have unveiled a significant security vulnerability in advanced chiplet-based systems, demonstrating that side-channel attacks can be executed across... Read original →
Industry Analysis
The chiplet security gap has shifted from theoretical concern to tangible threat. Researchers demonstrated that communication modules—originally for RFID or contactless coupling—can be weaponized as internal eavesdropping channels across 2.5D/3D stacks, exposing the illusion of physical isolation. Technically, EDA flows and interposer designs must now embed dynamic EM leakage models. Compliance-wise, standards like ISO/IEC 17826 and NIST SP 800-193 will soon mandate chiplet-level side-channel audits, raising certification costs for AI/HPC chips. Strategically, Intel’s EMIB and TSMC’s (Taiwan, China) SoIC will need to expose hardened physical-layer defenses, while AMD and NVIDIA may push a 'Trusted Chiplet' consortium. Within 18 months, active shielding and noise obfuscation will become non-negotiable IP features—security is no longer just logical, but a prerequisite for advanced packaging itself.
Read Original Article →
This page displays AI-generated summaries and metadata for research purposes. Original content belongs to the respective publishers.